Yves Saint Laurent's Touche Éclat All-Over Brightening Foundation has long been a cult favorite, lauded for its luminous finish and skin-enhancing properties. However, in recent years, YSL revamped the formula, sparking a flurry of questions and comparisons amongst loyal users. This article delves deep into the differences between the old and new formulations of the Touche Éclat foundation, offering a comprehensive comparison based on texture, coverage, finish, longevity, and shade range, supported by before-and-after pictures and addressing common concerns surrounding the reformulation. We'll also touch upon related YSL products, including the YSL cushion foundation, and provide resources for shade selection.
Before & After: A Visual Comparison
*(Insert before-and-after photos here. These should ideally show the same individual wearing both the old and new formulas, under similar lighting conditions. Focus on showcasing differences in coverage, finish, and overall look. Multiple photos showcasing different lighting and angles would be beneficial.)*
The before-and-after pictures clearly demonstrate some key differences. (Describe the observations from the pictures. For example: "The old formula, as seen in the left image, provides a more sheer, almost imperceptible coverage, leaving a noticeable natural glow. The new formula, shown on the right, offers a more buildable medium coverage while still maintaining a luminous finish, albeit with a slightly less dewy effect.") This visual comparison serves as a crucial starting point for our detailed analysis.
Texture and Application:
The most immediately noticeable difference lies in the texture. The old Touche Éclat foundation possessed a remarkably lightweight, almost watery consistency. It blended effortlessly onto the skin, feeling incredibly comfortable and barely noticeable. The new formula, while still lightweight, has a slightly thicker, creamier consistency. This change affects application; while still easy to blend, it requires a slightly more deliberate approach than its predecessor. Some users might find the new formula slightly more prone to settling into fine lines, particularly with heavier application.
Coverage and Finish:
This is perhaps the most debated aspect of the reformulation. The old formula was renowned for its sheer, luminous finish – a barely-there coverage that enhanced the skin's natural radiance. Many users loved this for its natural, "no-makeup makeup" look. The new formula, however, offers a more buildable medium coverage. While still luminous, the finish is less dewy and more of a satin or radiant finish. This increased coverage is a double-edged sword. Those seeking a sheer, natural look might find the new formula too heavy, while those who previously found the old formula too light will appreciate the improved coverage.
Longevity and Wear:
The longevity of both formulas varies depending on skin type and environmental factors. The old formula, due to its lighter consistency, tended to fade slightly quicker, particularly in warmer weather or with oily skin. The new formula, with its slightly denser consistency, generally offers improved longevity, lasting longer throughout the day. However, touch-ups might still be necessary depending on individual needs.
Shade Range and Color Matching:
current url：https://jgdpde.ec581.com/products/ysl-touche-eclat-foundation-old-vs-new-94832